Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33798565›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Actin bundle architecture and mechanics regulate myosin II force generation.

Kimberly L Weirich, Samantha Stam, Edwin Munro, Margaret L Gardel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decoding Cytoskeletal Mechanobiology with Tunable Microenvironments.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elucidating chiral myosin-induced actin dynamics: From single-filament behavior to collective structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The structure and mechanics of the cell cortex depend on the location and adhesion state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimberly L WeirichJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Samantha StamBiophysical Sciences Graduate Program, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Edwin MunroInstitute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Molecular Genetics and Cellular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Margaret L GardelJames Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: gardel@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago - Renewal 0T32EB009412 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ENGEL, GREGORY S, SOSNICK, TOBIN R · 2009 to 2023
$4.9M
Dynamics and regulation of actomyosin contractility in the C. elegans embryoR01GM098441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MUNRO, EDWIN MARSHALL · 2011 to 2020
$2.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009412NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The actin cytoskeleton is a soft, structural material that underlies biological processes such as cell division, motility, and cargo transport. The cross-linked actin filaments self-organize into a myriad of architectures, from disordered meshworks to ordered bundles, which are hypothesized to control the actomyosin force generation that regulates cell migration, shape, and adhesion. Here, we use fluorescence microscopy and simulations to investigate how actin bundle architectures with varying polarity, spacing, and rigidity impact myosin II dynamics and force generation. Microscopy reveals that mixed-polarity bundles formed by rigid cross-linkers support slow, bidirectional myosin II filament motion, punctuated by periods of stalled motion. Simulations reveal that these locations of stalled myosin motion correspond to sustained, high forces in regions of balanced actin filament polarity. By contrast, mixed-polarity bundles formed by compliant, large cross-linkers support fast, bidirectional motion with no traps. Simulations indicate that trap duration is directly related to force magnitude and that the observed increased velocity corresponds to lower forces resulting from both the increased bundle compliance and filament spacing. Our results indicate that the microstructures of actin assemblies regulate the dynamics and magnitude of myosin II forces, highlighting the importance of architecture and mechanics in regulating forces in biological materials.

Indexed as

ActinsMyosin Type IIActin CytoskeletonActomyosinMyosinsActinsActomyosinMyosinsMyosin Type II

Identifiers

PMID33798565
PMCPMC8204393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.