Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33798190›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Computation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from network models of point neurons.

Pablo Martínez-Cañada, Torbjørn V Ness, Gaute T Einevoll, Tommaso Fellin, Stefano Panzeri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Invariants for neural automata.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo Martínez-CañadaNeural Coding Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2634-5229
Torbjørn V NessFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-8502
Gaute T EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-5012
Tommaso FellinNeural Coding Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Stefano PanzeriNeural Coding Laboratory, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-8909
Italian Institute of Technology · ITNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Readout and control of spatiotemporal neuronal codes for behaviorU19NS107464 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHOHAM, SHY · 2018 to 2022
$17.3M
Studying perceptual decision-making across cortex by combining population imaging, connectomics, and computational modelingR01NS108410 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARVEY, CHRISTOPHER D, LEE, WEI-CHUNG ALLEN · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS108410NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a major tool for non-invasively studying brain function and dysfunction. Comparing experimentally recorded EEGs with neural network models is important to better interpret EEGs in terms of neural mechanisms. Most current neural network models use networks of simple point neurons. They capture important properties of cortical dynamics, and are numerically or analytically tractable. However, point neurons cannot generate an EEG, as EEG generation requires spatially separated transmembrane currents. Here, we explored how to compute an accurate approximation of a rodent's EEG with quantities defined in point-neuron network models. We constructed different approximations (or proxies) of the EEG signal that can be computed from networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) point neurons, such as firing rates, membrane potentials, and combinations of synaptic currents. We then evaluated how well each proxy reconstructed a ground-truth EEG obtained when the synaptic currents of the LIF model network were fed into a three-dimensional network model of multicompartmental neurons with realistic morphologies. Proxies based on linear combinations of AMPA and GABA currents performed better than proxies based on firing rates or membrane potentials. A new class of proxies, based on an optimized linear combination of time-shifted AMPA and GABA currents, provided the most accurate estimate of the EEG over a wide range of network states. The new linear proxies explained 85-95% of the variance of the ground-truth EEG for a wide range of network configurations including different cell morphologies, distributions of presynaptic inputs, positions of the recording electrode, and spatial extensions of the network. Non-linear EEG proxies using a convolutional neural network (CNN) on synaptic currents increased proxy performance by a further 2-8%. Our proxies can be used to easily calculate a biologically realistic EEG signal directly from point-neuron simulations thus facilitating a quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental EEG recordings.

Indexed as

Models, Neurologicalalpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic AcidBrainElectrodesElectroencephalographygamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansNeuronsalpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acidgamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID33798190
PMCPMC8046357
OpenAlexW3097044977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.