Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33798099›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Spatial tuning of electrophysiological responses to multisensory stimuli reveals a primitive coding of the body boundaries in newborns.

Irene Ronga, Mattia Galigani, Valentina Bruno, Jean-Paul Noel, Andrea Gazzin, Cristina Perathoner, Andrea Serino, Francesca Garbarini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial: The bodily self in the multisensory world.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Irene RongaMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2960-4639
Mattia GaliganiMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-7719
Valentina BrunoMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-695X
Jean-Paul NoelCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Andrea GazzinNeonatal Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-2831
Cristina PerathonerNeonatal Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1495-9664
Andrea SerinoMySpace Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesca GarbariniMANIBUS Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy; francesca.garbarini@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1210-0175
University of Turin · ITNew York University · USUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to identify our own body and its boundaries is crucial for survival. Ideally, the sooner we learn to discriminate external stimuli occurring close to our body from those occurring far from it, the better (and safer) we may interact with the sensory environment. However, when this mechanism emerges within ontogeny is unknown. Is it something acquired throughout infancy, or is it already present soon after birth? The presence of a spatial modulation of multisensory integration (MSI) is considered a hallmark of a functioning representation of the body position in space. Here, we investigated whether MSI is present and spatially organized in 18- to 92-h-old newborns. We compared electrophysiological responses to tactile stimulation when concurrent auditory events were delivered close to, as opposed to far from, the body in healthy newborns and in a control group of adult participants. In accordance with previous studies, adult controls showed a clear spatial modulation of MSI, with greater superadditive responses for multisensory stimuli close to the body. In newborns, we demonstrated the presence of a genuine electrophysiological pattern of MSI, with older newborns showing a larger MSI effect. Importantly, as for adults, multisensory superadditive responses were modulated by the proximity to the body. This finding may represent the electrophysiological mechanism responsible for a primitive coding of bodily self boundaries, thus suggesting that even just a few hours after birth, human newborns identify their own body as a distinct entity from the environment.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaPhysical StimulationBrainElectroencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornLearningReaction TimeSpace Perceptionbody representationERPmultisensory integrationnewbornsperipersonal space

Identifiers

PMID33798099
PMCPMC8000027
OpenAlexW3134573888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.