Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33798094›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19.

Laura M Giurge, Ashley V Whillans, Ayse Yemiscigil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
54.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Brazilian children's quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of contextual factors and dimensions.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Parenting, Gender, and Perception of Changes in Children's Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 Fear Impact on Israeli and Maltese Female "Help" Profession Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sex differences among users of NSAIDs and opioids during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura M GiurgeDepartment of Organizational Behavior, London Business School, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-391X
Ashley V WhillansNegotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163; awhillans@hbs.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-6978
Ayse YemiscigilHuman Flourishing Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-2412
Harvard University · USHarvard University Press · USLondon Business School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered how people spend time, with possible consequences for subjective well-being. Using diverse samples from the United States, Canada, Denmark, Brazil, and Spain (

Indexed as

InternationalitySex CharacteristicsAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsCOVID-19gendersubjective well-beingtimework–life balance

Identifiers

PMID33798094
PMCPMC7999869
OpenAlexW3134347150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.