ArticleHuman brain mapping2021
Neurophysiological and functional neuroanatomical coding of statistical and deterministic rule information during sequence learning.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural representations of statistical and rule-based predictions in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- The complexity of measuring reliability in learning tasks: An illustration using the Alternating Serial Reaction Time Task.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Modality-specific and modality-independent neural representations work in concert in predictive processes during sequence learning.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- A neurophysiological perspective on the integration between incidental learning and cognitive control.Communications biology · 2023Article
- On the Role of Stimulus-Response Context in Inhibitory Control in Alcohol Use Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Brain-correlates of processing local dependencies within a statistical learning paradigm.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
- Statistical learning occurs during practice while high-order rule learning during rest period.NPJ science of learning · 2021Article
- Neurophysiological and functional neuroanatomical coding of statistical and deterministic rule information during sequence learning.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Statistical and sequence learning lead to persistent memory in children after a one-year offline period.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Access to Procedural Memories After One Year: Evidence for Robust Memory Consolidation in Tourette Syndrome.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- A Process-Oriented View of Procedural Memory Can Help Better Understand Tourette's Syndrome.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Regularity detection under stress: Faster extraction of probability-based regularities.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are capable of acquiring multiple types of information presented in the same information stream. It has been suggested that at least two parallel learning processes are important during learning of sequential patterns-statistical learning and rule-based learning. Yet, the neurophysiological underpinnings of these parallel learning processes are not fully understood. To differentiate between the simultaneous mechanisms at the single trial level, we apply a temporal EEG signal decomposition approach together with sLORETA source localization method to delineate whether distinct statistical and rule-based learning codes can be distinguished in EEG data and can be related to distinct functional neuroanatomical structures. We demonstrate that concomitant but distinct aspects of information coded in the N2 time window play a role in these mechanisms: mismatch detection and response control underlie statistical learning and rule-based learning, respectively, albeit with different levels of time-sensitivity. Moreover, the effects of the two learning mechanisms in the different temporally decomposed clusters of neural activity also differed from each other in neural sources. Importantly, the right inferior frontal cortex (BA44) was specifically implicated in visuomotor statistical learning, confirming its role in the acquisition of transitional probabilities. In contrast, visuomotor rule-based learning was associated with the prefrontal gyrus (BA6). The results show how simultaneous learning mechanisms operate at the neurophysiological level and are orchestrated by distinct prefrontal cortical areas. The current findings deepen our understanding on the mechanisms of how humans are capable of learning multiple types of information from the same stimulus stream in a parallel fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.