Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797739›Full record

ArticleDrugs in R&D2021

Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Aaron J Heffernan, Fekade B Sime, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly Lim, Saiyuri Naicker, Katherine T Andrews, David Ellwood, Jeffrey Lipman, Keith Grimwood, Jason A Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in R&D, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aaron J HeffernanSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. aaron.heffernan@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-9812
Fekade B SimeCentre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly LimCentre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Saiyuri NaickerCentre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Katherine T AndrewsGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.
David EllwoodSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Keith GrimwoodSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Jason A RobertsCentre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Griffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though nebulised administration of amikacin can achieve high epithelial lining fluid concentrations, this has not translated into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials. One possible reason is that the cellular and chemical composition of the epithelial lining fluid may inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify whether the epithelial lining fluid components inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing.

methodsTwo amikacin-susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 and 8 mg/L) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were exposed in vitro to amikacin concentrations up to 976 mg/L in the presence of an acidic pH, mucin and/or surfactant as a means of simulating the epithelial lining fluid, the site of bacterial infection in pneumonia. Pharmacodynamic modelling was used to describe associations between amikacin concentrations, bacterial killing and emergence of resistance.

resultsIn the presence of broth alone, there was rapid and extensive (> 6 - log

conclusionsOur findings indicate that simulating the epithelial lining fluid antagonises amikacin-mediated killing of P. aeruginosa, even at the high concentrations achieved following nebulised administration.

Indexed as

AmikacinPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33797739
PMCPMC8017437
OpenAlexW3143054433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.