Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797712›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2021

Genomics governance: advancing justice, fairness and equity through the lens of the African communitarian ethic of Ubuntu.

Nchangwi Syntia Munung, Jantina de Vries, Bridget Pratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bioinformatics proficiency among African students.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nchangwi Syntia MunungDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. nchangwi.munung@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-3602
Jantina de VriesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7192-2633
Bridget PrattCentre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-3560

Funding

Sickle Africa Data Coordinating CenterU24HL135600 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MULDER, NICOLA, WONKAM, AMBROISE · 2017 to 2025
$8.6M
Return of a Fragile X Syndrome genetic result: exploring the feedback of individual genetic findings and their relation to traditional knowledge in a village in Cameroon.U54HG009790 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI WONKAM, AMBROISE · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
Stigma in African genomics research on Schizophrenia and Rheumatic Heart DiseaseU01HG008226 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI DE VRIES, JANTINA · 2015 to 2017
$247k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008226NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG008226NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG009790NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG009790NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL135600NHLBI NIH HHS U24HL135600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest for a communitarian approach to the governance of genomics, and for such governance to be grounded in principles of justice, equity and solidarity. However, there is a near absence of conceptual studies on how communitarian-based principles, or values, may inform, support or guide the governance of genomics research. Given that solidarity is a key principle in Ubuntu, an African communitarian ethic and theory of justice, there is emerging interest about the extent to which Ubuntu could offer guidance for the governance of genomics research in Africa. To this effect, we undertook a conceptual analysis of Ubuntu with the goal of identifying principles that could inform equity-oriented governance of genomics research. Solidarity, reciprocity, open sharing, accountability, mutual trust, deliberative decision-making and inclusivity were identified as core principles that speak directly to the different macro-level ethical issues in genomics research in Africa such as: the exploitation of study populations and African researchers, equitable access and use of genomics data, benefit sharing, the possibility of genomics to widen global health inequities and the fair distribution of resources such as intellectual property and patents. We use the identified the principles to develop ethical guidance for genomics governance in Africa.

Indexed as

GenomicsSocial JusticeHumansMotivationResearch PersonnelSocial ResponsibilityAfricaEquityGenomicsGovernanceJusticeReciprocitySolidarityUbuntu

Identifiers

PMID33797712
PMCPMC8349790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.