Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797658›Full record

Trial reportInflammopharmacology2021

Efficiency and safety: comparison between preoperative analgesia and postoperative analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

Ling Ma, Liguo Zhang, Hanbing Wang, Changlin Jiang

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling Ma *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medical Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314001, China.
Liguo Zhang *Pain Management Department, Chengfeng Hospital of Daqing Oilfield, Daqing, 163001, China.
Hanbing WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daqing Longnan Hospital, 35 Aiguo Road, Ranghu Road District, Daqing, 163453, China. bingchen79034@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-7251
Changlin JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, No. 9 Zhongkang Road, Sartu District, Daqing, 163001, China. jingcaiyou564@163.com.
Daqing Oilfield General Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNJiaxing University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Project of Jiaxing City 2018AY32012the Key Medical Subjects Established by Zhejiang Province and Jiaxing City Jointly --Pain Medicine 2019-ss-ttyx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficiency regarding postoperative pain control, consumption of rescue drug, patients' satisfaction and the safety of preoperative analgesia versus postoperative analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients who received arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS).

methodsFour hundred and sixty-four patients who received AKS were recruited in this multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Subsequently, they were randomized into PRE group (N = 232) and POST group (N = 232). In PRE group, patients received celecoxib, meloxicam or rofecoxib from 2 h pre-operation (Pre (- 2 h)) to 48 h post-operation for analgesia. In POST group, patients received celecoxib, meloxicam or rofecoxib from 4 to 48 h post-operation for analgesia.

resultsh and 12 h; pain VAS at passive movement was reduced in PRE group than POST group at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. Additionally, consumption of rescue drug (pethidine) was decreased, while overall satisfaction was increased in PRE group compared to POST group. As for adverse events, the incidences of nausea, vomiting, constipation, drowsiness and dizziness were similar between PRE group and POST group. In subgroup analysis, the pain VAS score at passive movement at 6 h and nausea and constipation incidences were distinctive among subgroups categorized by meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib administration. However, no difference of other assessments was found among subgroups categorized by meloxicam, celecoxib and rofecoxib administration.

conclusionPreoperative analgesia using NSAIDs is more efficient and equivalently tolerable compared to postoperative analgesia using NSAIDs in patients who receive AKS.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesiaAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalArthroscopyCelecoxibFemaleHumansKnee JointLactonesMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPostoperative CarePostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainPreoperative CareAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibLactonesrofecoxibSulfonesArthroscopic knee surgeryCelecoxibEfficacyMeloxicamPreoperative analgesiaRofecoxibSafety

Identifiers

PMID33797658
OpenAlexW3148258423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.