ArticleRheumatology international2021
Ankylosing spondylitis rehabilitation publications and the global productivity: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis (2000-2019).
Article in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Handgrip strength as a valuable multidimensional clinical parameter: a cross-sectional Scopus-based analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus-related infections in pregnancy: a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Global research trends in biological therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: A comprehensive visualization and bibliometric study (2004-2023).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Publication activity trends in the field of social media in rheumatology: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Global research trends on fibromyalgia and exercise: a ten-year Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the advance of artificial intelligence in medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Medical Education and Artificial Intelligence: Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2013-2022).JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Scientific mapping of research on English as a foreign language (EFL) reading instruction: A thirty-year perspective.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Bibliometric and altmetric analyses of publication activity in the field of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in 2011-2021 based on web of science core collection databases.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Article
- Research on primary Sjögren's syndrome in 2004-2021: a Web of Science-based cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Mapping of global research on familial Mediterranean fever: a SCI-Expanded-based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the global literature productivity of adult-onset Still's disease (2011-2020).Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2022Article
- Research Trends around Exercise Rehabilitation among Cancer Patients: A Bibliometrics and Visualized Knowledge Graph Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- COVID-19 from a rheumatology perspective: bibliometric and altmetric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2021Review
- Bibliometric analysis of publication activity in the field of familial Mediterranean fever in 2010-2019: a Scopus-based study.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Bibliometric and Altmetric Analyses of Publication Activity in the Field of Behcet's Disease in 2010-2019.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation programs have an important place in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but there is no comprehensive bibliometric research that assesses publications on AS rehabilitation in a holistic way. The aim of this study was to investigate the quantity and quality of articles related to AS rehabilitation and to reveal the features of global productivity in this topic. This bibliometric study was conducted utilizing the Web of Science (WoS) database with the keywords 'ankylosing spondylitis rehabilitation', 'ankylosing spondylitis exercise', 'ankylosing spondylitis physical therapy' and 'ankylosing spondylitis physiotherapy'. The number of articles, citations, and main active countries were determined and trend analyses were performed. A total of 792 articles were reviewed. The articles originated from 51 different countries, 22 of which met the main active country criteria. A significant increase trend was detected in the number of articles between 2000 and 2019 (p < 0.001). The five most productive countries were Germany (n = 111; 14.02%), Turkey (n = 98; 12.37%), the United States (n = 71; 8.96%), the United Kingdom (n = 53; 6.69%) and the Netherlands (n = 53; 6.69%). The highest values in number of articles per million population were calculated in Norway, the Netherlands and Austria, respectively. In the analysis according to GDP, Norway, the Netherlands and Turkey were ranked as the first three. The top three countries for the average citation count were France, Netherlands and Germany. This bibliometric study can be considered as an assessment and summary of worldwide scientific production on AS rehabilitation. The data demonstrate an increasing trend in research productivity since 2000. European countries were seen to be at the forefront both quantitatively and qualitatively in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.