Observational studySkeletal radiology2021
Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma.
Observational study in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging of ewing sarcoma: an updated analysis including presenting features, prognostic imaging biomarkers, and treatment response assessment.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Bone tumor recognition strategy based on object region and context representation in medical decision-making system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ewing sarcoma of the temporal bone with aneurysmal bone cyst-like changes: A rare case report with an unusual radiological presentation.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- The dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging features of alveolar soft part sarcoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Pitfalls of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Clinical Utility of T2 Shine-through and T2 Black-out for Musculoskeletal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis Solution by Enhancing the Edge Features of Medical Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Methodological considerations on segmenting rhabdomyosarcoma with diffusion-weighted imaging-What can we do better?Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the expression pattern and diagnostic value of PPARγ in malignant and benign primary bone tumors.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Reduction in Acquisition Time and Improvement in Image Quality in T2-Weighted MR Imaging of Musculoskeletal Tumors of the Extremities Using a Novel Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Technique in a Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) Sequence.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Multiparametric MRI evaluation of bone sarcomas in children.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to assess the ability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiating Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional observational study included a total of 35 patients with a recent diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma (n = 13) and osteosarcoma (n = 22) who underwent conventional MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Three ADC measurements from the areas of the lowest diffusivity in ADC maps (ADC
resultsThere was a significant difference between the ADC
conclusionDiffusion-weighted imaging and ADC values could be used in the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma in borderline cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33797564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.