Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797561›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Nutrition delivery after emergency laparotomy in surgical ward: a retrospective cohort study.

Juho Nurkkala, Sanna Lahtinen, Aura Ylimartimo, Timo Kaakinen, Merja Vakkala, Marjo Koskela, Janne Liisanantti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive value of various nutritional assessment scores for Short-term outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery: A prospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juho NurkkalaMedical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland. juho.nurkkala@student.oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-8078
Sanna Lahtinen *Medical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Aura Ylimartimo *Medical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Timo KaakinenMedical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Merja VakkalaMedical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Marjo KoskelaMedical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Janne LiisananttiMedical Research Centre and Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 21, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Oulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdequate nutrition after major abdominal surgery is associated with less postoperative complications and shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) after elective procedures, but there is a lack of studies focusing on the adequacy of nutrition after emergency laparotomies (EL). The aim of the present study was to investigate nutrition adequacy after EL in surgical ward.

methodsThe data from 405 adult patients who had undergone emergency laparotomy in Oulu University Hospital (OUH) between years 2015 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Nutrition delivery and complications during first 10 days after the operation were evaluated.

resultsThere was a total of 218 (53.8%) patients who were able to reach cumulative 80% nutrition adequacy during the first 10 postoperative days. Patients with adequate nutrition (> 80% of calculated calories) met the nutritional goals by the second postoperative day, whereas patients with low nutrition delivery (< 80% of calculated calories) increased their caloric intake during the first 5 postoperative days without reaching the 80% level. In multivariate analysis, postoperative ileus [4.31 (2.15-8.62), P < 0.001], loss of appetite [3.59 (2.18-5.93), P < 0.001] and higher individual energy demand [1.004 (1.003-1.006), P = 0.001] were associated with not reaching the 80% nutrition adequacy.

conclusionsInadequate nutrition delivery is common during the immediate postoperative period after EL. Oral nutrition is the most efficient way to commence nutrition in this patient group in surgical ward. Nutritional support should be closely monitored for those patients unable to eat. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

LaparotomyNutritional StatusAdultHospitalsHumansLength of StayNutritional SupportRetrospective StudiesEmergency laparotomyEnteral nutritionNutrition adequacyNutritional supportParenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID33797561
PMCPMC8825430
OpenAlexW3149840770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.