Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797082›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2021

Annual Research Review: Youth firearm violence disparities in the United States and implications for prevention.

Jessika H Bottiani, Daniel A Camacho, Sarah Lindstrom Johnson, Catherine P Bradshaw

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conducting Actionable Economic Policy Research to Address Community Violence Inequities.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Introduction to the Special Issue on Structural Approaches to Youth Violence Prevention: Addressing Racism and Discrimination.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A mixed-methods investigation of firearm experiences among sexual and gender minority young adults of color in Detroit.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessika H BottianiSchool of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-1707
Daniel A CamachoSchool of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8043-7541
Sarah Lindstrom JohnsonSanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-1162
Catherine P BradshawSchool of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2048-3225
University of Virginia · USArizona State University · US

Funding

R-CITY: Erasing Racism and Violence through Collaborative Intervention with Teachers and YouthR01MD013808 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BRADSHAW, CATHERINE PILCHER · 2019 to 2025
$3.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD011130NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch has identified the United States (U.S.) as a global outlier in its firearm ownership rates, with a correspondingly higher risk of youth firearm violence compared to other countries. The relative extent of disparities in youth firearm violence within the U.S. has been less clear. Little is known about factors in the social ecology driving these disparities and whether current firearm violence prevention approaches sufficiently address them.

methodApplying a health disparities framework, we synthesized epidemiological, sociological, and prevention science literatures, emphasizing structural inequalities in youth sociocultural positionality in life course developmental context. We also highlighted findings from national injury data and other studies regarding the magnitude and impacts of youth firearm violence disparities.

resultsThe burden of firearm violence varied markedly at intersections of gender, race, place, developmental stage, and homicidal or suicidal intent. Firearm homicide among Black boys and young men (ages 15-24) was at outlier levels - many times greater than the rates of any other demographic group, developmental stage, or violence intent, particularly in urban settings. Recent research has operationalized structural racism and implicated historically racialized spaces as a root cause of this disparity. In contrast, elevated firearm suicide rates were found among Native and White boys and young men in rural settings; firearm-related cultural attitudes and gender socialization were points of consideration to explain these disparities. We highlighted research-based youth firearm violence preventive interventions, and emphasized gaps in efforts focused on structural and sociocultural factors.

conclusionsMore explicit attention to reducing firearm homicide among Black boys and young men and firearm suicide among Native and rural White boys and young men is urgently needed and has potential to substantially lower overall rates of firearm violence in the U.S.

Indexed as

HomicideSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultHumansMaleSuicidal IdeationUnited StatesViolenceYoung AdultAdolescencefirearm violencepreventionracial disparitiessocio-cultural influencestructural inequality

Identifiers

PMID33797082
PMCPMC9993333
OpenAlexW3144241682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.