Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33797058›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2021

Randomized Single-Case Intervention Designs and Analyses for Health Sciences Researchers: A Versatile Clinical Trials Companion.

Joel R Levin, Thomas R Kratochwill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of single case experimental designs in evidence creation in rehabilitation.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Honoring Uncontrolled Events: Commentary on Slocum et al.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel R LevinEmeritus of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 3850 E. Placita de Peri, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA. jrlevin@u.arizona.edu.
Thomas R KratochwillEmeritus of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, S 7572 Oak Road, Merrimac, WI, 53561, USA.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAn expository note introduces health sciences researchers to randomized single-case intervention designs, an adaptation of interrupted time-series methodology, and the staple of a scientifically credible small-sample research paradigm.

methodsDetailed examples illustrating two different randomized single-case procedures are presented to highlight the techniques' advantages relative to small-sample nonparametric procedures that are commonly applied in the medical and health sciences fields.

resultsNumerous positive outcomes, based on both statistical simulation studies and actual intervention research investigations, support the applicability and value of these procedures.

conclusionRandomized single-case intervention designs are recommended for consideration by health sciences researchers.

Identifiers

PMID33797058
PMCPMC8015743
OpenAlexW3142300509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.