ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021
Recent Advancements in Engineered Biomaterials for the Regeneration of Female Reproductive Organs.
Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal exposure to cyclophosphamide during prepubertal life does not affect the cryosusceptibility of in vitro derived mouse embryos.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Article
- Association of serum AMH levels with the number of oocytes retrieved in adolescent and young adult women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- An injectable gelatin/sericin hydrogel loaded with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of uterine injury.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds in constructing artificial ovaries for ovarian failure: a systematic methodological review.Human reproduction open · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various gynecologic diseases and chemoradiation or surgery for the management of gynecologic malignancies may damage the uterus and ovaries, leading to clinical problems such as infertility or early menopause. Embryo or oocyte cryopreservation-the standard method for fertility preservation-is not a feasible option for patients who require urgent treatment because the procedure requires ovarian stimulation for at least several days. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for patients diagnosed with premature menopause is contraindicated for patients with estrogen-dependent tumors or a history of thrombosis. Furthermore, these methods cannot restore the function of the uterus and ovaries. Although autologous transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue is being attempted, it may re-introduce malignant cells after cancer treatment. With the recent development in regenerative medicine, research on engineered biomaterials for the restoration of female reproductive organs is being actively conducted. The use of engineered biomaterials is a promising option in the field of reproductive medicine because it can overcome the limitations of current therapies. Here, we review the ideal properties of biomaterials for reproductive tissue engineering and the recent advancements in engineered biomaterials for the regeneration of female reproductive organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33797052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.