ArticlePsychometrika2021
Asymptotically Corrected Person Fit Statistics for Multidimensional Constructs with Simple Structure and Mixed Item Types.
Article in Psychometrika, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust estimation of the latent trait in graded response models.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Asymptotically Correct Person Fit z-Statistics For the Rasch Testlet Model.Psychometrika · 2024Article
- Enhancing the Detection of Social Desirability Bias Using Machine Learning: A Novel Application of Person-Fit Indices.Educational and psychological measurement · 2024Article
- Efficient Corrections for Standardized Person-Fit Statistics.Psychometrika · 2024Article
- A Comparison of Person-Fit Indices to Detect Social Desirability Bias.Educational and psychological measurement · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Person fit statistics are frequently used to detect aberrant behavior when assuming an item response model generated the data. A common statistic, [Formula: see text], has been shown in previous studies to perform well under a myriad of conditions. However, it is well-known that [Formula: see text] does not follow a standard normal distribution when using an estimated latent trait. As a result, corrections of [Formula: see text], called [Formula: see text], have been proposed in the literature for specific item response models. We propose a more general correction that is applicable to many types of data, namely survey or tests with multiple item types and underlying latent constructs, which subsumes previous work done by others. In addition, we provide corrections for multiple estimators of [Formula: see text], the latent trait, including MLE, MAP and WLE. We provide analytical derivations that justifies our proposed correction, as well as simulation studies to examine the performance of the proposed correction with finite test lengths. An applied example is also provided to demonstrate proof of concept. We conclude with recommendations for practitioners when the asymptotic correction works well under different conditions and also future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33797016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.