Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796997›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2021

The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Margin Status in Breast Cancer Patients Recalled at Biennial Screening Mammography: An Observational Cohort Study.

Jessie J J Gommers, Lucien E M Duijm, Peter Bult, Luc J A Strobbe, Toon P Kuipers, Marianne J H Hooijen, Ritse M Mann, Adri C Voogd

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jessie J J GommersDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jessie.Gommers@radboudumc.nl.
Lucien E M DuijmDepartment of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter BultDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luc J A StrobbeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Toon P KuipersDepartment of Radiology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands.
Marianne J H HooijenDepartment of Radiology, St Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Adri C VoogdDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLSt. Anna Ziekenhuis · NLZiekenhuis Bernhoven · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to examine the association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical margin involvement, as well as to determine the factors associated with positive resection margins in screen-detected breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

methodsBreast cancer patients eligible for BCS and diagnosed after biennial screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands (2008-2017) were retrospectively included. Missing values were imputed and multivariable regression analyses were performed to analyze whether preoperative MRI was related to margin involvement after BCS, as well as to examine what factors were associated with positive resection margins, defined as more than focally (>4 mm) involved.

resultsOverall, 2483 patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled, of whom 123 (5.0%) had more than focally involved resection margins. In multivariable regression analyses, preoperative MRI was associated with a reduced risk of positive resection margins after BCS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.96). Lobular histology (adjusted OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.68-4.87), large tumor size (per millimeter increase, adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07), high (>75%) mammographic density (adjusted OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.07-12.12), and the presence of microcalcifications (adjusted OR 4.45, 95% CI 2.69-7.37) and architectural distortions (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01-3.40) were independently associated with positive resection margins after BCS.

conclusionsPreoperative MRI was associated with lower risk of positive resection margins in patients with invasive breast cancer eligible for BCS using multivariable analysis. Furthermore, specific mammographic characteristics and tumor characteristics were independently associated with positive resection margins after BCS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33796997
PMCPMC8460561
OpenAlexW3151760520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.