Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796967›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2021

The use of HEPES-buffer in the production of gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals - time to reconsider strict pharmacopoeial limits?

Jannie le Roux, Janke Kleynhans, Sietske Rubow

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Towards Optimal AutomatedJournal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals · 2024
    Article
  5. Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Salivary Gland Regeneration-Where Are We Today?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Pharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  7. A Specific HPLC Method to Determine Residual HEPES in [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Cold Kit Labeling: The Future ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jannie le RouxNuMeRI Node for Infection Imaging, Central Analytical Facilities, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. jsleroux@sun.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-3236
Janke KleynhansNuclear Medicine Division, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Sietske RubowNuclear Medicine Division, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid) is a buffer that is used in the radiolabelling of gallium-68 compounds. The beneficial effects of HEPES on molar activity in bioconjugates have been well described. Current strict regulations on the HEPES content in radiopharmaceuticals limit its use when intended for parenteral administration.This short communication summarizes data from the literature on the toxicity of HEPES in dogs after intravenous infusion and the subsequent use in humans. We also highlight the use of HEPES in an FDA labelled intravenous drug formulation. Regulatory institutions may consider this data to review current strict limits.

Indexed as

Gallium-68HEPESHuman useLimitsRadiopharmaceuticalsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID33796967
PMCPMC8017018
OpenAlexW3141173277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.