Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796853›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Prognostic value of neurofilament light chain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Joris Godelaine, Maxim De Schaepdryver, Xavier Bossuyt, Philip Van Damme, Kristl G Claeys, Koen Poesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fluid Biomarkers for Monitoring Structural Changes in Polyneuropathies: Their Use in Clinical Practice and Trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joris GodelaineDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiomarker Research, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7899-3776
Maxim De SchaepdryverDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiomarker Research, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Xavier BossuytDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Philip Van DammeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-2357
Kristl G ClaeysDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Koen PoesenDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiomarker Research, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-9476
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is a neuroinflammatory disorder with considerable variation in clinical phenotype, disease progression and therapy response among patients. Recently, paranodal antibodies associated with poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and more aggressive disease course have been described in small subsets of patients, but reliable serum-based prognostic biomarkers are not yet available for the general population. In current retrospective longitudinal study, we utilized logistic regression models to investigate the associations of serum neurofilament light chain levels with 1-year disease progression and therapy response during follow-up in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. One-year disease progression was defined as a decrease of four or more points (the minimal clinically important difference) on an 80-point Medical Research Council sum-score scale 1 year after sampling. Patients who, compared to treatment received at time of sampling, required therapy switch during follow-up due to insufficient effect were classified as non-responders. Serum neurofilament light chain was measured by electrochemiluminescence assay in clinical residual serum samples of 76 patients diagnosed with probable (13 patients) or definite (63 patients) chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy according to European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria. Eleven (15%) patients were female, and the mean (standard deviation) cohort age was 61.5 (11.7) years. In both univariate and multivariable (including demographics) models, elevated serum neurofilament light chain harboured increased odds for 1-year disease progression (respectively odds ratio, 1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.022-1.084 and odds ratio, 1.097; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-1.169; both

Indexed as

biomarkersCIDPneurofilament light chainprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33796853
PMCPMC7991223
OpenAlexW3139032973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.