Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796526›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Tumor Hypoxia Drives Genomic Instability.

Ming Tang, Emma Bolderson, Kenneth J O'Byrne, Derek J Richard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypoxia-driven remodeling of SELENOPNature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Hypoxic adaptation theory of cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ming TangCentre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Emma BoldersonCentre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kenneth J O'ByrneCentre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Derek J RichardCentre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. As a common characteristic of cancer, hypoxia is associated with poor prognosis due to enhanced tumor malignancy and therapeutic resistance. The enhanced tumor aggressiveness stems at least partially from hypoxia-induced genomic instability. Therefore, a clear understanding of how tumor hypoxia induces genomic instability is crucial for the improvement of cancer therapeutics. This review summarizes recent developments highlighting the association of tumor hypoxia with genomic instability and the mechanisms by which tumor hypoxia drives genomic instability, followed by how hypoxic tumors can be specifically targeted to maximize efficacy.

Indexed as

cancer therapeutic resistanceconceptual lethalityDNA damage repairDNA damage responsegenomic instabilityHIF-1αtumor hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID33796526
PMCPMC8007910
OpenAlexW3139143383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.