ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021
Approaches to Improve Endometrial Receptivity in Case of Repeated Implantation Failures.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions for recurrent embryo implantation failure: An umbrella review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- The value of intraovarian autologous platelet rich plasma in women with poor ovarian reserve or ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- The value of platelet-rich plasma in women with previous implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Pooled it
- A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Trial
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Toward a Precision Medicine Framework for Biologically Guided Patient Selection.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endometrial elasticity in infertile women assessed by transvaginal shear wave elastography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Investigation of the effect of intrauterine injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the results of in vitro fertilization (IVF): A cohort study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026Article
- Endometrial BCL6 Expression and Reproductive Outcomes in Infertile Women: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-driven text mining of the female reproductive system: enabling multiscale biomedical modeling and personalized medicine.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Endometrial senescence: inevitability and conditional occurrence in female fertility.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Adverse clinical outcomes in patients with good ovarian reserve are linked to a history of cured tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Molecular Crosstalk Between Intrauterine hCG and Endometrial Receptivity: Signalling Pathways, Immune Modulation, and Translational Perspectives in IVF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Development of a New Personalized Molecular Test Based on Endometrial Receptivity and Maternal-Fetal Dialogue: Adhesio.Biochemical genetics · 2025Article
- Live birth rate and perinatal outcomes following sequential embryo transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Review
- Uterine Microbiota and Bisphenols: Novel Influencers in Reproductive Health.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Effects of acupuncture and moxibustion therapy on endometrial receptivity of infertile women withFrontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy after recurrent implantation failure (RIF)-a prospective cohort follow-up study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- An Approach to Improve Endometrial Receptivity: Is It Beneficial to Flush The Uterine Cavity with Follicular Fluid and Granulosa Cells? A Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repeated implantation failures are a constant challenge in reproductive medicine with a significant impact both on health providers and on infertile couples. Several approaches have been proposed so far as effective; however, accumulative data have clarified that most of the treatment options do not have the evidence base for a generalized application to be suggested by the relevant societies. Implantation failures are attributed to either poor quality embryos or to defected endometrial receptivity. The current review aims to summarize in a systematic way all the new trends in managing RIF via interference with endometrial receptivity. The authors focus mainly, but not exclusively, on endometrial injury prior to embryo transfer and endometrial priming with autologous cells or biological agents. To this direction, a systematic search of the Pubmed database has been conducted taking into account the emerged evidence of the last two decades. All the suggested interventions are herein presented and analyzed in terms of reproductive outcomes. It is evident that properly powered and designed randomized trials are needed to support a new standard approach in RIF treatment that will safely be incorporated in national and international guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.