Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

The Quixotic Task of Forecasting Peaks of COVID-19: Rather Focus on Forward and Backward Projections.

Ruy Freitas Reis, Rafael Sachetto Oliveira, Bárbara de Melo Quintela, Joventino de Oliveira Campos, Johnny Moreira Gomes, Bernardo Martins Rocha, Marcelo Lobosco, Rodrigo Weber Dos Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruy Freitas ReisDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Rafael Sachetto OliveiraDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Brazil.
Bárbara de Melo QuintelaDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Joventino de Oliveira CamposCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas de Gerais, Leopoldina, Brazil.
Johnny Moreira GomesPós-Graduação em Modelagem Computacional, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Bernardo Martins RochaDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Marcelo LoboscoDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Rodrigo Weber Dos SantosDepartamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last months, mathematical models have been extensively used to help control the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Although extremely useful in many tasks, most models have performed poorly in forecasting the pandemic peaks. We investigate this common pitfall by forecasting four countries' pandemic peak: Austria, Germany, Italy, and South Korea. Far from the peaks, our models can forecast the pandemic dynamics 20 days ahead. Nevertheless, when calibrating our models close to the day of the pandemic peak, all forecasts fail. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis revealed the main obstacle: the misestimation of the transmission rate. Inverse uncertainty quantification has shown that significant changes in transmission rate commonly precede a peak. These changes are a key factor in forecasting the pandemic peak. Long forecasts of the pandemic peak are therefore undermined by the lack of models that can forecast changes in the transmission rate, i.e., how a particular society behaves, changes of mitigation policies, or how society chooses to respond to them. In addition, our studies revealed that even short forecasts of the pandemic peak are challenging. Backward projections have shown us that the correct estimation of any temporal change in the transmission rate is only possible many days ahead. Our results suggest that the distance between a change in the transmission rate and its correct identification in the curve of active infected cases can be as long as 15 days. This is intrinsic to the phenomenon and how it affects epidemic data: a new case is usually only reported after an incubation period followed by a delay associated with the test. In summary, our results suggest the phenomenon itself challenges the task of forecasting the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic when only epidemic data is available. Nevertheless, we show that exciting results can be obtained when using the same models to project different scenarios of reduced transmission rates. Therefore, our results highlight that mathematical modeling can help control COVID-19 pandemic by backward projections that characterize the phenomena' essential features and forward projections when different scenarios and strategies can be tested and used for decision-making.

Indexed as

ForecastingModels, TheoreticalAustriaCOVID-19GermanyHumansItalyPandemicsRepublic of KoreaCOVID-19epidemiologyforecastingmathematical modelingprojectionuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID33796495
PMCPMC8007858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.