Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796380›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Optical palpation for tumor margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery.

Ken Y Foo, Kelsey M Kennedy, Renate Zilkens, Wes M Allen, Qi Fang, Rowan W Sanderson, James Anstie, Benjamin F Dessauvagie, Bruce Latham, Christobel M Saunders and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ken Y FooBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5984-2574
Kelsey M KennedyBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
Renate ZilkensBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
Wes M AllenBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-7421
Qi FangBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
Rowan W SandersonBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
James AnstieBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
Benjamin F DessauvagieSchool of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Bruce LathamPathWest, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia.
Christobel M SaundersSchool of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Lixin ChinBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.
Brendan F KennedyBRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative margin assessment is needed to reduce the re-excision rate of breast-conserving surgery. One possibility is optical palpation, a tactile imaging technique that maps stress (force applied across the tissue surface) as an indicator of tissue stiffness. Images (optical palpograms) are generated by compressing a transparent silicone layer on the tissue and measuring the layer deformation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). This paper reports, for the first time, the diagnostic accuracy of optical palpation in identifying tumor within 1 mm of the excised specimen boundary using an automated classifier. Optical palpograms from 154 regions of interest (ROIs) from 71 excised tumor specimens were obtained. An automated classifier was constructed to predict the ROI margin status by first choosing a circle diameter, then searching for a location within the ROI where the circle was ≥ 75% filled with high stress (indicating a positive margin). A range of circle diameters and stress thresholds, as well as the impact of filtering out non-dense tissue regions, were tested. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing the automated classifier results with the true margin status, determined from co-registered histology. 83.3% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity were achieved, compared to 69.0% sensitivity and 79.0% specificity obtained with OCT alone on the same dataset using human readers. Representative optical palpograms show that positive margins containing a range of cancer types tend to exhibit higher stress compared to negative margins. These results demonstrate the potential of optical palpation for margin assessment.

Identifiers

PMID33796380
PMCPMC7984801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.