ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Digital adaptive optics based on digital lateral shearing of the computed pupil field for point scanning retinal swept source OCT.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image formation theory of optical coherence tomography with optical aberrations and its application to computational aberration correction.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Computational approach for correcting defocus and suppressing speckle noise in line-field optical coherence tomography images.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Wide Dynamic Range Digital Aberration Measurement and Fast Anterior-Segment OCT ImagingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Correcting spatial-spectral crosstalk and chromatic aberrations in broadband line-scan spectral-domain OCT images.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Computational refocusing of Jones matrix polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography and investigation of defocus-induced polarization artifacts.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Digital ocular swept source optical coherence aberrometry.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Toward a clinical optoretinogram: a review of noninvasive, optical tests of retinal neural function.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel non-iterative digital adaptive optics technique is presented in which the wavefront error is calculated using the phase difference between the pupil field and its digital copies translated by a pixel along the horizontal and vertical direction in the pupil plane. This method provides slope data per pixel, thus can generate > 50k local slope data samples for a circular pupil of diameter 256 pixels with high accuracy and dynamic range. It offers more than 12x faster computational speed in comparison to the sub-aperture based digital adaptive optics method. Furthermore, it is independent of any system parameters, the light distribution in the pupil plane, or the intensity of the image. The technique is useful in applications such as interferometric or digital holography based microscopy, metrology, and as digital wavefront sensor in adaptive optics, where focusing of light in the sample is involved that creates a guide star or where the sample itself exhibits guide star-like structures. This technique is implemented in a point scanning swept-source OCT at 1060 nm, and a large wavefront error with a peak to valley of 20 radians and root mean square error of 0.71 waves is detected and corrected in case of a micro-beads phantom sample. Also, human photoreceptor images are recovered from aberrated retinal OCT volumes acquired at eccentricities of 2 and 2.5 degrees from the fovea
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.