ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Development of a digital breast phantom for photoacoustic computed tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A virtual imaging framework for three-dimensional quantitative optoacoustic tomography using stochastic numerical breast phantoms.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Application of a virtual imaging framework for investigating a deep learning-based reconstruction method for 3D quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Challenges and advances in two-dimensional photoacoustic computed tomography: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Mitigating Under-Sampling Artifacts in 3D Photoacoustic Imaging Using Res-UNet Based on Digital Breast Phantom.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Photoacoustic digital brain and deep-learning-assisted image reconstruction.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Stochastic three-dimensional numerical phantoms to enable computational studies in quantitative optoacoustic computed tomography of breast cancer.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Deep-E: A Fully-Dense Neural Network for Improving the Elevation Resolution in Linear-Array-Based Photoacoustic Tomography.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a pipeline for simulation, reconstruction, and classification in ultrasound-aided diffuse optical tomography of breast tumors.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Optical Resolution Photoacoustic Microscopy Imaging in the Detection of Early Oral Cancer under Image Reconstruction Algorithm.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Optical breast atlas as a testbed for image reconstruction in optical mammography.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Translational Photoacoustic Imaging for Disease Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Surgical Guidance: introduction to the feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoacoustic (PA) imaging provides morphological and functional information about angiogenesis and thus is potentially suitable for breast cancer diagnosis. However, the development of PA breast imaging has been hindered by inadequate patients and a lack of ground truth images. Here, we report a digital breast phantom with realistic acoustic and optical properties, with which a digital PA-ultrasound imaging pipeline is developed to create a diverse pool of virtual patients with three types of masses: ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, and fibroadenoma. The experimental results demonstrate that our model is realistic, flexible, and can be potentially useful for accelerating the development of PA breast imaging technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.