Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33796299›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Bacterial uropathogens and susceptibility testing among patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia.

Tewodros Tesfa, Yohannes Baye, Mekonnen Sisay, Firehiwot Amare, Tigist Gashaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. UropathogenicJournal of medicine and life · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tewodros TesfaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-2179
Yohannes BayeDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Mekonnen SisayDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-1174
Firehiwot AmareDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-4008
Tigist GashawDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infection is a common infection posing a significant healthcare burden globally. Currently, it is becoming hard to manage due to the drug resistance of uropathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of culture positivity and the susceptibility pattern of isolates among clinically diagnosed patients with urinary tract infection.

methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted on patients clinically diagnosed with urinary tract infections and received a drug prescription at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital from August 2018 to June 2019. A clean-catch mid-stream urine specimen was collected and bacterial identification and susceptibility test were performed using standard microbiological methods. Data were entered into EpiInfo 7 and exported to STATA 15 for analysis. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and bi-variate and multivariate regression analyses and presented with graphs, frequency, and tables.

resultsA total of 687 urine samples were collected from patients with clinically diagnosed urinary tract infections. The mean age was 31 years and 56.62% were female. 28.38% of the participants had a culture-positive result, of which 86.15% had monomicrobial infections. Inpatients (AOR = 3.8, 95% CI = (1.8-7.9)) and hypertensive patients (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI = (1.1-4.4)) had higher odds of culture-positive results.

conclusionAbout one-third of the clinically diagnosed patients with urinary tract infection were culture-positive with many types of bacterial uropathogens. Inpatients and hypertensive patients had a higher risk of developing bacterial infections. Bacterial isolates showed different percentages of susceptibility to the tested antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibiotic susceptibility testEastern Ethiopiaurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID33796299
PMCPMC7970184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.