Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795790›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Influence of different breast expression techniques on human colostrum macronutrient concentrations.

Camila Barros Melgaço da Silva, Bernardo Vicari do Valle, Úrsula Medeiros Araújo de Matos, Yasmin Notarbartolo di Villarosa do Amaral, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Alan Araújo Vieira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Barros Melgaço da SilvaFaculty of Medicine, Maternal and Child Department, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. milabarros@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-3495
Bernardo Vicari do ValleFaculty of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-8689
Úrsula Medeiros Araújo de MatosFaculty of Medicine, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-2905
Yasmin Notarbartolo di Villarosa do AmaralClinical Research Department, National Institute for Women's, Children's and Adolescent's Health Fernandes Figueira/FIOCRUZ, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-0564
Maria Elisabeth Lopes MoreiraClinical Research Department, National Institute for Women's, Children's and Adolescent's Health Fernandes Figueira/FIOCRUZ, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-0294
Alan Araújo VieiraFaculty of Medicine, Maternal and Child Department, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRFundação Instituto de Pesca do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of breast expression methods on macronutrient and caloric concentrations in human colostrum. STUDY

designA cross-sectional study in which colostrum samples were collected simultaneously from each breast using different milk expression methods, including manual expression or electric pumping, assigned by simple randomization. Macronutrients were measured by infrared spectroscopy, and their concentrations were compared by the Wilcoxon test.

resultsNinety-six samples from each breast of selected donors were evaluated. There were no differences in carbohydrate (6.1 vs. 6.1 g/dL; p: 0.218) and protein (2.1 vs. 2.1 g/dL; p: 0.772) concentrations between the samples collected by manual expression and electric pumping. However, in those collected by manual expression, lipid concentrations (2.6 vs. 2.2 g/dL; p < 0.001) and caloric content (60 vs. 57 Kcal/dL; p = 0.001) were higher.

conclusionsColostrum collected by hand expression had a higher lipid concentration and caloric content than that collected by an electric pump.

Indexed as

ColostrumMilk, HumanBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNutrientsPregnancyNutrients

Identifiers

PMID33795790
OpenAlexW3149487817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.