Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795779›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Signal quality as Achilles' heel of graph theory in functional magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Johan Baijot, Stijn Denissen, Lars Costers, Jeroen Gielen, Melissa Cambron, Miguel D'Haeseleer, Marie B D'hooghe, Anne-Marie Vanbinst, Johan De Mey, Guy Nagels and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Johan Baijot *Center For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. johan.baijot@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-7845
Stijn Denissen *Center For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Lars CostersCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jeroen GielenCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Melissa CambronCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Miguel D'HaeseleerCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie B D'hoogheCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne-Marie VanbinstCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan De MeyDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Guy NagelsCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jeroen Van SchependomCenter For Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph-theoretical analysis is a novel tool to understand the organisation of the brain.We assessed whether altered graph theoretical parameters, as observed in multiple sclerosis (MS), reflect pathology-induced restructuring of the brain's functioning or result from a reduced signal quality in functional MRI (fMRI). In a cohort of 49 people with MS and a matched group of 25 healthy subjects (HS), we performed a cognitive evaluation and acquired fMRI. From the fMRI measurement, Pearson correlation-based networks were calculated and graph theoretical parameters reflecting global and local brain organisation were obtained. Additionally, we assessed metrics of scanning quality (signal to noise ratio (SNR)) and fMRI signal quality (temporal SNR and contrast to noise ratio (CNR)). In accordance with the literature, we found that the network parameters were altered in MS compared to HS. However, no significant link was found with cognition. Scanning quality (SNR) did not differ between both cohorts. In contrast, measures of fMRI signal quality were significantly different and explained the observed differences in GTA parameters. Our results suggest that differences in network parameters between MS and HS in fMRI do not reflect a functional reorganisation of the brain, but rather occur due to reduced fMRI signal quality.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonAdolescentAdultAgedBrainBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesCognitionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID33795779
PMCPMC8016888
OpenAlexW3143191652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.