Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795751›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Molecular diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Sikkim, India and prediction of dominant spoligotypes using artificial intelligence.

Kangjam Rekha Devi, Jagat Pradhan, Rinchenla Bhutia, Peggy Dadul, Atanu Sarkar, Nitumoni Gohain, Kanwar Narain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Antimicrobial resistance profile and prevalence ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Dynamics ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kangjam Rekha DeviN.E. Region, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-Regional Medical Research Centre, Post Box #105, Dibrugarh, Assam, 786 001, India.
Jagat PradhanNational Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), Gangtok, Sikkim, India.
Rinchenla BhutiaNational Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), Gangtok, Sikkim, India.
Peggy DadulDepartment of Health Care, Human Services and Family Welfare, State Tuberculosis Control Society, Gangtok, Sikkim, India.
Atanu SarkarN.E. Region, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-Regional Medical Research Centre, Post Box #105, Dibrugarh, Assam, 786 001, India.
Nitumoni GohainN.E. Region, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-Regional Medical Research Centre, Post Box #105, Dibrugarh, Assam, 786 001, India.
Kanwar NarainN.E. Region, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-Regional Medical Research Centre, Post Box #105, Dibrugarh, Assam, 786 001, India. kanwar_narain@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, tuberculosis is an enormous public health problem. This study provides the first description of molecular diversity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) from Sikkim, India. A total of 399 Acid Fast Bacilli sputum positive samples were cultured on Lőwenstein-Jensen media and genetic characterisation was done by spoligotyping and 24-loci MIRU-VNTR typing. Spoligotyping revealed the occurrence of 58 different spoligotypes. Beijing spoligotype was the most dominant type constituting 62.41% of the total isolates and was associated with Multiple Drug Resistance. Minimum Spanning tree analysis of 249 Beijing strains based on 24-loci MIRU-VNTR analysis identified 12 clonal complexes (Single Locus Variants). The principal component analysis was used to visualise possible grouping of MTBC isolates from Sikkim belonging to major spoligotypes using 24-MIRU VNTR profiles. Artificial intelligence-based machine learning (ML) methods such as Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to predict dominant spoligotypes of MTBC using MIRU-VNTR data. K-fold cross-validation and validation using unseen testing data set revealed high accuracy of ANN, RF, and SVM for predicting Beijing, CAS1_Delhi, and T1 Spoligotypes (93-99%). However, prediction using the external new validation data set revealed that the RF model was more accurate than SVM and ANN.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveArtificial IntelligenceBacterial Typing TechniquesGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansMachine LearningMinisatellite RepeatsMycobacterium tuberculosisNeural Networks, ComputerPhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33795751
PMCPMC8016865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.