ArticleScientific reports2021
Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual outcome of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in eyes with short axial length.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Interocular Axial Length Asymmetry and Postoperative Refractive Error After Bilateral Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Accuracy of the Majority Voting Method with Multiple IOL Power Formulae.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Refractive Accuracy of ORA and the Factors Impacting Residual Astigmatism in Patients Implanted with Trifocal IOLs During Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Risk Factor for Transient Hyperopic Refractive Outcome at Acute Postoperative Period After Panoptix Intraocular Lens Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Refraction and defocus curves in eyes with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.Journal of optometryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.