Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795383›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

New generation of DNA-based immunotherapy induces a potent immune response and increases the survival in different tumor models.

Alessandra Lopes, Chiara Bastiancich, Mathilde Bausart, Sophie Ligot, Laure Lambricht, Kevin Vanvarenberg, Bernard Ucakar, Bernard Gallez, Véronique Préat, Gaëlle Vandermeulen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clinical and Translational Advances in Glioma Immunotherapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra Lopes *Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara Bastiancich *Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-5654
Mathilde BausartLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie LigotLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Laure LambrichtLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Kevin VanvarenbergLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard UcakarLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard GallezLouvain Drug Research Institute, Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Véronique PréatLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium veronique.preat@uclouvain.be.
Gaëlle VandermeulenLouvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8696-9642
UCLouvain · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies to increase nucleic acid vaccine immunogenicity are needed to move towards clinical applications in oncology. In this study, we designed a new generation of DNA vaccines, encoding an engineered vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein as a carrier of foreign T cell tumor epitopes (plasmid to deliver T cell epitopes, pTOP). We hypothesized that pTOP could activate a more potent response compared with the traditional DNA-based immunotherapies, due to both the innate immune properties of the viral protein and the specific induction of CD4 and CD8 T cells targeting tumor antigens. This could improve the outcome in different tumor models, especially when the DNA-based immunotherapy is combined with a rational therapeutic strategy.

methodsThe ability of pTOP DNA vaccine to activate a specific CD4 and CD8 response and the antitumor efficacy were tested in a B16F10-OVA melanoma (subcutaneous model) and GL261 glioblastoma (subcutaneous and orthotopic models).

resultsIn B16F10-OVA melanoma, pTOP promoted immune recognition by adequate processing of both MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes and had a higher antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell (CTL) killing activity. In a GL261 orthotopic glioblastoma, pTOP immunization prior to tumor debulking resulted in 78% durable remission and long-term survival and induced a decrease of the number of immunosuppressive cells and an increase of immunologically active CTLs in the brain. The combination of pTOP with immune checkpoint blockade or with tumor resection improved the survival of mice bearing, a subcutaneous melanoma or an orthotopic glioblastoma, respectively.

conclusionsIn this work, we showed that pTOP plasmids encoding an engineered vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein, and containing various foreign T cell tumor epitopes, successfully triggered innate immunity and effectively promoted immune recognition by adequate processing of both MHC-I and MHC-II epitopes. These results highlight the potential of DNA-based immunotherapies coding for viral proteins to induce potent and specific antitumor responses.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineImmunotherapyAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBrain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyEpitopes, T-LymphocyteGlioblastomaHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunity, InnateAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteG protein, vesicular stomatitis virusHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMembrane GlycoproteinsVaccines, DNAViral Envelope Proteinsactiveadaptive immunityantigenscellularimmunityimmunotherapyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID33795383
PMCPMC8021892
OpenAlexW3143698803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.