ReviewJournal of cell science2021
Data science in cell imaging.
Review in Journal of cell science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- DySTrack - a modular smart microscopy tool for live tracking of dynamic samples on modern commercial microscopes.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
- Single-cell hit calling in high-content imaging screens with Buscar.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- CausalXtract, a flexible pipeline to extract causal effects from live-cell time-lapse imaging data.eLife · 2025Article
- AI-based hardware and software tools in microscopy to boost research in immunology and virology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Building a FAIR image data ecosystem for microscopy communities.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Review
- Research data management for bioimaging: the 2021 NFDI4BIOIMAGE community survey.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Bioprinting of Complex Multicellular Organs with Advanced Functionality-Recent Progress and Challenges Ahead.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022Review
- Bioimage analysis workflows: community resources to navigate through a complex ecosystem.F1000Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell imaging has entered the 'Big Data' era. New technologies in light microscopy and molecular biology have led to an explosion in high-content, dynamic and multidimensional imaging data. Similar to the 'omics' fields two decades ago, our current ability to process, visualize, integrate and mine this new generation of cell imaging data is becoming a critical bottleneck in advancing cell biology. Computation, traditionally used to quantitatively test specific hypotheses, must now also enable iterative hypothesis generation and testing by deciphering hidden biologically meaningful patterns in complex, dynamic or high-dimensional cell image data. Data science is uniquely positioned to aid in this process. In this Perspective, we survey the rapidly expanding new field of data science in cell imaging. Specifically, we highlight how data science tools are used within current image analysis pipelines, propose a computation-first approach to derive new hypotheses from cell image data, identify challenges and describe the next frontiers where we believe data science will make an impact. We also outline steps to ensure broad access to these powerful tools - democratizing infrastructure availability, developing sensitive, robust and usable tools, and promoting interdisciplinary training to both familiarize biologists with data science and expose data scientists to cell imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.