Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795334›Full record

ArticleGenome research2021

Antisense RNAs during early vertebrate development are divided in groups with distinct features.

Sanjana Pillay, Hazuki Takahashi, Piero Carninci, Aditi Kanhere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. High-throughput Screening of Sequence Elements Associated with RNA Localization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhanced RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas technology in zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Endogenous Double-Stranded RNA.Non-coding RNA · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjana PillayDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Hazuki TakahashiLaboratory for Transcriptome Technology, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-7349
Piero CarninciLaboratory for Transcriptome Technology, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-7243
Aditi KanhereInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-9006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs or lncRNAs are a class of non-protein-coding RNAs that are >200 nt in length. Almost 50% of lncRNAs during zebrafish development are transcribed in an antisense direction to a protein-coding gene. However, the role of these natural antisense transcripts (NATs) during development remains enigmatic. To understand NATs in early vertebrate development, we took a computational biology approach and analyzed existing as well as novel data sets. Our analysis indicates that zebrafish NATs can be divided into two major classes based on their coexpression patterns with respect to the overlapping protein-coding genes. Group 1 NATs have characteristics similar to maternally deposited RNAs in that their levels decrease as development progresses. Group 1 NAT levels are negatively correlated with that of overlapping sense-strand protein-coding genes. Conversely, Group 2 NATs are coexpressed with overlapping protein-coding genes. In contrast to Group 1, which is enriched in genes involved in developmental pathways, Group 2 protein-coding genes are enriched in housekeeping functions. Group 1 NATs also show larger overlap and higher complementarity with the sense-strand mRNAs compared to other NATs. In addition, our transcriptomics data, quantifying RNA levels from cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, indicates that Group 1 NATs are more abundant in the cytosol. Based on their expression pattern, cytosolic nature, and their higher complementarity to the overlapping developmental mRNAs, we speculate that Group 1 NATs function post-transcriptionally to silence spurious expression of developmental genes.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisRNA, AntisenseZebrafishAnimalsRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeRNA, AntisenseRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID33795334
PMCPMC8168585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.