ArticleBMJ open2021
Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Evolution and Application of Disease Control Priorities].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Pooled it
- The use of deliberative dialogue in health services research: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Factors influencing non-communicable disease policy process in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Adapting the deliberative democracy approach to LMIC settings: a case study in Nigeria.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Observational
- Potential health and economic impact of achieving Kenya's overweight and obesity reduction target: a modelling study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Scooping Review of Diabetes Research in Kenya from 2000 to 2020.The East African health research journal · 2024Review
- Perceptions of diabetes risk and prevention in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative and theory of change development study.PloS one · 2024Article
- A qualitative evaluation of priority-setting by the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel in Kenya.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Prioritisation processes for programme implementation and evaluation in public health: A scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Fighting Cancer around the World: A Framework for Action.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The avoidable disease burden associated with overweight and obesity in Kenya: A modelling study.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the stakeholders' perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease (NCD) control in Kenya.
designA qualitative study approach conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that followed a deliberative dialogue process.
settingStudy was conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that was held in October 2019 in Nairobi, Kenya.
participantsStakeholders who currently participate in the national level policymaking process for health in Kenya. OUTCOME MEASURE: Priority setting process for NCD control in Kenya.
resultsDonor funding was identified as a key factor that informed the priority setting process for NCD control. Misalignment between donors' priorities and the country's priorities for NCD control was seen as a hindrance to the process. It was identified that there was minimal utilisation of context-specific evidence from locally conducted research. Additional factors seen to inform the priority setting process included political leadership, government policies and budget allocation for NCDs, stakeholder engagement, media, people's cultural and religious beliefs.
conclusionThere is an urgent need for development aid partners to align their priorities to the specific NCD control priority areas that exist in the countries that they extend aid to. Additionally, context-specific scientific evidence on effective local interventions for NCD control is required to inform areas of priority in Kenya and other low-income and middle-income countries. Further research is needed to develop best practice guidelines and tools for the creation of national-level priority setting frameworks that are responsive to the identified factors that inform the priority setting process for NCD control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.