Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795299›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Randomised clinical trial for the cost-utility evaluation of two strategies of perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection in the context of anorectal carcinoma: biological mesh repair versus primary perineal wound closure, study protocol for the GRECCAR 9 Study.

Etienne Buscail, Cindy Canivet, Laurent Ghouti, Sylvain Kirzin, Nicolas Carrere, Laurent Molinier, Aline Rosillo, Valerie Lauwers-Cances, Nadège Costa, French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR Group)

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02841293 (Cost-utility Evaluation of Two Strategies of Perineal Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection for Anorectal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02841293 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cost-utility Evaluation of Two Strategies of Perineal Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection for Anorectal Carcinoma: Perineal Filling With Biological Meshes vs. Primary Perineal Wound Closure

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2021 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsAbdominoperineal ResectionArmsBiological mesh, Primary perineal wound closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Etienne Buscail *Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France ebuscail@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2040-3045
Cindy Canivet *Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, CHU-Rangueil and the University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Laurent GhoutiDigestive Surgery, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sylvain KirzinDugestive Surgery Department, Capio Clinic La Croix du Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.
Nicolas CarrereDigestive Surgery, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Laurent MolinierDepartment of Medical Information, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Aline RosilloDRCI, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Valerie Lauwers-CancesDepartment of Epidemiology, Health Economics and Public Health, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Nadège CostaDepartment of Medical Information, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR Group)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRInserm · FRSanté Publique France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAbdominoperineal resections performed for anorectal tumours leave a large pelvic and perineal defect causing a high rate of morbidity of the perineal wound (40%-60%). Biological meshes offer possibilities for new standards of perineal wound reconstruction. Perineal fillings with biological mesh are expected to increase quality of life by reducing perineal morbidity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised and single-blinded study with a blinded endpoint evaluation, the experimental arm of which uses a biological mesh and the control arm of which is defined by the primary closure after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Patients eligible for inclusion are patients with a proven history of rectal adenocarcinoma and anal canal epidermoid carcinoma for whom abdominoperineal resection was indicated after a multidisciplinary team discussion. All patients must have social security insurance or equivalent social protection. The main objective is to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of two strategies of perineal closure after an abdominoperineal resection performed for anorectal cancer treatment: perineal filling with biological mesh versus primary perineal closure (70 patient in each arm). The secondary objectives focus on quality of life and morbidity data during a 1-year follow-up. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be performed in order to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the ICUR. CIs will be constructed using the non-parametric bootstrap approach. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve will be built so as to estimate the probability of efficiency of the biological meshes given a collective willingness-to-pay threshold. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board of 'Nord Ouest 1' (protocol reference number: 20.05.14.60714; national number: 2020-A01169-30).The results will be disseminated through conventional scientific channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02841293).

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCarcinomaProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPerineumPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Meshcolorectal surgeryhealth economicsoncologywound management

Identifiers

PMID33795299
PMCPMC8021762
OpenAlexW3145304456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.