ArticleBMJ open2021
Multimethods study comparing the experiences of medical clinical academics with nurses, midwives and allied health professionals pursuing a clinical academic career.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary: Articulating your research focus via a capability statement: professional development for early career researchers.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2025Article
- Are Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) research ready? A regional evaluation in England: the Research ABC project (AHPs Building Research Capacity Across the Black Country).BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Students' and educators' perceptions of clinical academic pathways in the UK: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Development of a capability framework for Allied Health research careers in health services.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Clinical academics' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of challenges and opportunities when working at the clinical frontline.BMJ leader · 2023Article
- Article
- Spotlight on the academic multidisciplinary team: proposals from the 3rd NIHR Newcastle BRC Academic Geriatric Medicine Workshop.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Exploring individual character traits and behaviours of clinical academic allied health professionals: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Allied health professionals' research capacity: open to interpretation?BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs).BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Developing a clinical academic career pathway in a Community and Mental Health NHS Trust.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Research engagement by British early-career practitioners in nephrology: a multidisciplinary survey.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Reflections on contributing to health research: A qualitative interview study with research participants and patient advisors.PloS one · 2022Article
- A qualitative study exploring experiences and challenges of combining clinical academic training with family life.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- The rise and rise of NMAHPs in UK clinical research.Future healthcare journal · 2021Article
- Mental Health Nurses' and Allied Health Professionals' Individual Research Capacity and Organizational Research Culture: A Comparative Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare experiences of medical clinical academics (MCAs) with those of nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) pursuing a clinical academic career.
designA multimethods approach was used to elicit qualitative data. Both sets of participants completed similar online surveys followed by in-depth interviews to explore emerging themes.
settingThe research was conducted in the East Midlands of England, encompassing two Higher Education Institutions and four National Health Service Trusts.
participantsSurveys were completed by 67 NMAHPs and 73 MCA trainees. Sixteen participants from each group were interviewed following a similar interview schedule.
resultsThe survey data revealed notable differences in demographics of the two study populations, reflecting their different career structures. MCAs were younger and they all combined clinical and academic training, lengthening the time before qualification. In contrast, most NMAHPs had been in their clinical post for some years before embarking on a clinical academic pathway. Both routes had financial and personal repercussions and participants faced similar obstacles. However, there was also evidence of wide-ranging benefits from combining clinical and academic roles.
conclusionsVariations in experiences between the two study populations highlight a need for a clear academic pathway for all health professionals, as well as sufficient opportunities post-PhD to enable clinical academics to fully use their dual skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.