Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33795258›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Female Immunity Protects from Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Timothy Budden, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste, Sarah Craig, Yuan Hu, Charles H Earnshaw, Shilpa Gurung, Amelle Ra, Victoria Akhras, Patrick Shenjere, Ruth Green and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Timothy BuddenSkin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2500-2814
Caroline Gaudy-MarquesteAPHM, CRCM Inserm U1068, CNRS U7258, CHU Timone, Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix-Marseille Univesrity, Marseille, France.
Sarah CraigSkin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Yuan HuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0001-5395-9635
Charles H EarnshawSkin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Shilpa GurungSkin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Amelle RaDepartment of Dermatology, St. George's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-2573
Victoria AkhrasDepartment of Dermatology, St. George's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Patrick ShenjereDepartment of Histopathology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-6914
Ruth GreenDepartment of Histopathology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lynne JamiesonDepartment of Histopathology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
John LearDepartment of Dermatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Luisa MottaDepartment of Histopathology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Carlos CaulínDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Deemesh OuditDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Simon J FurneyGenomic Oncology Research Group, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-6800
Amaya VirósSkin Cancer and Ageing Lab, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. amaya.viros@cruk.manchester.ac.uk.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Arizona · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

Cancer Research UK A27412Wellcome 110078/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 110078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer susceptibility and mortality are higher in males, and the mutational and transcriptomic landscape of cancer differs by sex. The current assumption is that men are at higher risk of epithelial cancers as they expose more to carcinogens and accumulate more damage than women. We present data showing women present with less aggressive primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and early strong immune activation. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe explored clinical and molecular sexual disparity in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients with primary cSCC (

resultsWe show cSCC is more aggressive in men, and immunocompetent women develop mild cSCC, later in life. To test whether sex drives disparity, we exposed male and female mice to equal doses of carcinogen, and found males present with more aggressive, metastatic cSCC than females. Critically, females activate cancer immune-related expression pathways and CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration independently of mutations, a response that is absent in prednisolone-treated animals. In contrast, males increase the rate of mitosis and proliferation in response to carcinogen. Women's skin and keratinocytes also activate immune-cancer fighting pathways and immune cells at UV radiation-damaged sites. Critically, a compromised immune system leads to high-risk, aggressive cSCC specifically in women.

conclusionsThis work shows the immune response is sex biased in cSCC and highlights female immunity offers greater protection than male immunity.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsCarcinogensCarcinoma, Squamous CellCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHumansMaleMiceMitosisSkin NeoplasmsCarcinogens

Identifiers

PMID33795258
PMCPMC7613610
OpenAlexW3143530569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.