Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794979›Full record

SynthesisParasites & vectors2021

The largest meta-analysis on the global prevalence of microsporidia in mammals, avian and water provides insights into the epidemic features of these ubiquitous pathogens.

Yingfei Ruan, Xiaofei Xu, Qiang He, Li Li, Junrui Guo, Jialing Bao, Guoqing Pan, Tian Li, Zeyang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon spp. in Swedish patients with suspected gastrointestinal parasite infection: a cross-sectional molecular study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Characterization and Zoonotic Potential ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular epidemiology ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingfei RuanState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Xiaofei XuCollege of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Qiang HeState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Li LiCollege of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Junrui GuoState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Jialing BaoState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Guoqing PanState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Tian LiState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China. lit@swu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0130
Zeyang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Southwest University · CNChongqing Normal University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31472151National Natural Science Foundation of China 31770159National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772678Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2019yszx- jcyjX0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosporidia are obligate intracellular parasites that can infect nearly all invertebrates and vertebrates, posing a threat to public health and causing large economic losses to animal industries such as those of honeybees, silkworms and shrimp. However, the global epidemiology of these pathogens is far from illuminated.

methodsPublications on microsporidian infections were obtained from PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science and filtered according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Infection data about pathogens, hosts, geography and sampling dates were manually retrieved from the publications and screened for high quality. Prevalence rates and risk factors for different pathogens and hosts were analyzed by conducting a meta-analysis. The geographic distribution and seasonal prevalence of microsporidian infections were drawn and summarized according to sampling locations and date, respectively.

resultsAltogether, 287 out of 4129 publications up to 31 January 2020 were obtained and met the requirements, from which 385 epidemiological data records were retrieved and effective. The overall prevalence rates in humans, pigs, dogs, cats, cattle, sheep, nonhuman primates and fowl were 10.2% [2429/30,354; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-11.2%], 39.3% (2709/5105; 95% CI 28.5-50.1%), 8.8% (228/2890; 95% CI 5.1-10.1%), 8.1% (112/1226; 95% CI 5.5-10.8%), 16.6% (2216/12,175; 95% CI 13.5-19.8%), 24.9% (1142/5967; 95% CI 18.6-31.1%), 18.5% (1388/7009; 95% CI 13.1-23.8%) and 7.8% (725/9243; 95% CI 6.4-9.2%), respectively. The higher prevalence in pigs suggests that routine detection of microsporidia in animals should be given more attention, considering their potential roles in zoonotic disease. The highest rate was detected in water, 58.5% (869/1351; 95% CI 41.6-75.5%), indicating that water is an important source of infections. Univariate regression analysis showed that CD4+ T cell counts and the living environment are significant risk factors for humans and nonhuman primates, respectively. Geographically, microsporidia have been widely found in 92 countries, among which Northern Europe and South Africa have the highest prevalence. In terms of seasonality, the most prevalent taxa, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon, display different prevalence trends, but no significant difference between seasons was observed. In addition to having a high prevalence, microsporidia are extremely divergent because 728 genotypes have been identified in 7 species. Although less investigated, microsporidia coinfections are more common with human immunodeficiency virus and Cryptosporidium than with other pathogens.

conclusionsThis study provides the largest-scale meta-analysis to date on microsporidia prevalence in mammals, birds and water worldwide. The results suggest that microsporidia are highly divergent, widespread and prevalent in some animals and water and should be further investigated to better understand their epidemic features.

Indexed as

Global HealthAnimalsBirdsGenotypeGeographyHumansMammalsMicrosporidiaMicrosporidiosisPrevalenceRisk FactorsWaterZoonosesWaterEpidemiologyGlobal prevalenceMeta-analysisMicrosporidiaMicrosporidiosis

Identifiers

PMID33794979
PMCPMC8017775
OpenAlexW3150436562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.