Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794976›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

What are the challenges when recruiting to a trial in children's social care? A qualitative evaluation of a trial of foster carer training.

Gwenllian Moody, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Rebecca Cannings-John, Sue Channon, Elinor Coulman, Alyson Rees, Jeremy Segrott, Michael Robling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gwenllian MoodyCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. MoodyG@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-4944
Lucy Brookes-HowellCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Rebecca Cannings-JohnCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Sue ChannonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Elinor CoulmanCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Alyson ReesChildren's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), School of Social Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jeremy SegrottCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Michael RoblingCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

The Big Lottery Fund 0010250833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are comparatively rare in UK social work, but can offer distinct advantages. Confidence in Care (CiC) is an RCT with embedded process evaluation evaluating Fostering Changes (FC), a 12-week training programme for foster and kinship carers to increase skills and coping strategies. In order to mitigate challenges in participant recruitment, an engagement strategy was designed to maximise this. Our aim is to explore experiences of key study stakeholders towards trial recruitment and identify broader messages about recruitment to social care trials.

methodsThree focus groups were conducted, two with field-based recruiting staff (n = 7) and one with carers who attended the FC programme (n = 8). Five interviews were conducted with trainers who delivered FC, eight with foster carers who attended the programme, 18 with Foster Carers who elected not to take part in the programme, and 12 with social workers from participating trial sites. In addition, an away day for FC trainers was observed and discussions related to recruitment were noted. Transcribed audio-recorded data were inductively coded, double-coded by a second researcher, and thematically analysed.

resultsSix themes were identified. The first addressed pragmatic aspects of the intervention affecting recruitment (e.g. committing to a 12-week programme). A second focussed on accuracy of communication about the trial between provider agencies and carers. A third concerned the ability of recruiting staff to contact carers, a particular challenge in group-based recruitment. A fourth addressed trial methods and their communication (e.g. relationship between trial team and recruiting staff). A fifth explored lack of differentiation by carers between the roles of the various professionals (e.g. FC facilitators and provider agencies). The sixth addressed perceived differences between recruitment into social care and health studies.

conclusionsRecruitment challenges in this social care setting were similar to those in healthcare. Some (e.g. gatekeeping by professional staff) may be rooted in randomisation anxiety, or unfamiliarity with research methods. Researchers more familiar with healthcare recruitment were however encouraged about the experience of working in this care setting. The original recruitment strategy and adaptations form the basis of further recommendations for research practice.

trial registrationISRCTN19090228 . Registered on 11 January 2017.

Indexed as

CaregiversFoster Home CareAdaptation, PsychologicalChildClinical Trials as TopicFocus GroupsHumansPatient SelectionSocial SupportConfidence in CareFoster CareFostering ChangesLooked after childrenOut-of-home careSocial careTrial recruitment

Identifiers

PMID33794976
PMCPMC8015028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.