Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794949›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Enkelejda Lamaj, Erwin Vu, Janita E van Timmeren, Chiara Leonardi, Louise Marc, Izabela Pytko, Matthias Guckenberger, Panagiotis Balermpas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enkelejda Lamaj *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Erwin Vu *Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Janita E van TimmerenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Chiara LeonardiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Louise MarcDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Izabela PytkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Panagiotis BalermpasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Panagiotis.Balermpas@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-6446
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND

methodsTreatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2-2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsThe re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52-91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46-90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0-99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0-98.5%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsA significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyCochleaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultChemoradiotherapyCochlea sparingLate toxicityNasopharyngeal carcinomaVMAT

Identifiers

PMID33794949
PMCPMC8017833
OpenAlexW3142211386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.