Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794948›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Perspectives of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury following novel balance training involving functional electrical stimulation with visual feedback: a qualitative exploratory study.

David J Houston, Janelle Unger, Jae W Lee, Kei Masani, Kristin E Musselman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04262414 (Restoring Upright Mobility After Spinal Cord Injury Using Functional Electrical Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04262414 nacompletednot on this map

Restoring Upright Mobility After Spinal Cord Injury Using Functional Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled5ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Cord DiseasesArmsFunctional Electrical Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David J HoustonKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janelle UngerKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jae W LeeKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kei MasaniKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristin E MusselmanKITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. kristin.musselman@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8336-8211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with an incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) are highly susceptible to falls during periods of walking or standing. We recently reported the findings of a novel intervention combining functional electrical stimulation with visual feedback balance training (FES + VFBT) on standing balance abilities among five individuals with motor iSCI. However, the previous publication did not report the perceived impact of the intervention on the participants' lives. In this report, the experiences of these five individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) who had recently completed the four-week balance training program are described.

methodsFive individuals with a motor iSCI took part in this study. Each individual was at least 12 months post-injury, capable of unassisted standing for 60 s and had a Berg Balance Scale Score < 46. Participants completed twelve sessions of a novel balance intervention combining closed-loop functional electrical stimulation with visual feedback balance training (FES + VFBT). Participants received visual feedback regarding their centre of pressure position as they completed balance-training exercises while FES was applied to the ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors bilaterally. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after completion of the balance training intervention and eight-weeks post-training to understand participant's experiences. Categories and themes were derived from the transcripts using conventional content analysis.

resultsThree themes were identified from the collected transcripts: (1) Perceived benefits across International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health levels; (2) Change in perceived fall risk and confidence; (3) Motivation to keep going.

conclusionsParticipation in the FES + VFBT program resulted in perceived benefits that led to meaningful improvements in activities of daily living. Following completion of the training, individuals felt they still had the capacity to improve. Individuals felt they had increased their balance confidence, while a few participants also reported a decrease in their risk of falling. The inclusion of qualitative inquiry allows for the evaluation of the meaningfulness of an intervention and its perceived impact on the lives of the participants.

trial registrationNCT04262414 (retrospectively registered February 10, 2020).

Indexed as

AttitudeElectric StimulationFeedback, SensoryPostural BalanceAccidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedElectric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNeurological RehabilitationPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchBalance trainingFunctional electrical stimulationNeurorehabilitationSpinal cord injuryVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID33794948
PMCPMC8017659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.