Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794803›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.

Encarnación López-Gimeno, Gemma Falguera-Puig, Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández, Meritxell Angelet, Griselda Vázquez Garreta, Gloria Seguranyes

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Maternal-infant outcomes of birth planning: A review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Encarnación López-GimenoSexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services (ASSIR), Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Gran Via de les Corts Catalans, 587, 08006, Barcelona, Spain. encarnilg@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-9402
Gemma Falguera-PuigCap Sant Felix, Carretera de Barcelona 473, 08206, Sabadell Barcelona, Spain.
Mª Mercedes Vicente-HernándezSexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services (ASSIR), Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Gran Via de les Corts Catalans, 587, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell AngeletSexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services (ASSIR), Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Gran Via de les Corts Catalans, 587, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
Griselda Vázquez GarretaSexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services (ASSIR), Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Gran Via de les Corts Catalans, 587, 08006, Barcelona, Spain.
Gloria SeguranyesCap Sant Felix, Carretera de Barcelona 473, 08206, Sabadell Barcelona, Spain.
Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital de Sabadell · ESPrimary HealthCare · MT

Funding

Fundació Infermeria i Societat (ES) PR-224/2017Institut Catala de la Salut Ajuts XB. Research modules 10th Edition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe information on birth plan (BP) usage in Spanish hospitals is scant.

aimTo identify the percentage of pregnant women presenting a BP at five hospitals in Spain, the reasons why some women failed to do so and how BP presentation relates to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods.

methodsIn this descriptive, multi-centre study, data were retrospectively collected. During the postpartum visits at primary healthcare centres in various health districts in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain), a data collection sheet about obstetric outcomes and analgesia was administered to 432 mothers who had completed a BP during their pregnancies. The main outcome was the rate of BP presentation to the hospital. The sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics and pain relief measures were compared to identify any differences between mothers who presented a BP and those who did not.

resultsA total of 422 (99.7%) women were studied; 51.2% of women (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.4-55.9) had presented a BP. The main reason for not presenting a BP was because the hospital midwives did not request them (61.2%). No differences were observed in BP presentation according to age, the country of origin, education, employment or hospital. Mothers who presented a BP were more likely to start breastfeeding in the birthing room (82.4% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.024). Epidural analgesia was the most common method used for pain relief (88.9%), and women who presented a BP attempted to use concomitant non-pharmacological methods more often (50.5% vs. 38.8%; p = 0.012).

conclusionAlmost half of the mothers failed to present a BP, usually because midwives did not request it.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient PreferenceAdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalCommunicationCounselingDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansMidwiferyPregnancyPrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesSpainBirth planMidwifeObstetric labourPain relief

Identifiers

PMID33794803
PMCPMC8017698
OpenAlexW3145467576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.