Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794801›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Independent predictors for 90-day readmission of emergency department patients admitted with sepsis: a prospective cohort study.

Peer Oscar Overgaard Stenholt, S M Osama Bin Abdullah, Rune Husås Sørensen, Finn Erland Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trajectories of sepsis survivors in Australia: A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peer Oscar Overgaard StenholtDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Ebba Lunds Vej 40A, Entrance 67, 2400 NV, Copenhagen, Denmark. oscarstenholt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8348-3583
S M Osama Bin AbdullahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Rune Husås SørensenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Finn Erland NielsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Ebba Lunds Vej 40A, Entrance 67, 2400 NV, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKSlagelse Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of our study was to examine predictors for readmission in a prospective cohort of sepsis patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) and identified by the new Sepsis-3 criteria.

methodA single-center observational population-based cohort study among all adult (≥18 years) patients with sepsis admitted to the emergency department of Slagelse Hospital during 1.10.2017-31.03.2018. Sepsis was defined as an increase in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of ≥2. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission. We followed patients from the date of discharge from the index admission until the end of the follow-up period or until the time of readmission to hospital, emigration or death, whichever came first. We used competing-risks regression to estimate adjusted subhazard ratios (aSHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for covariates in the regression models.

resultsA total of 2110 patients were admitted with infections, whereas 714 (33.8%) suffered sepsis. A total of 52 patients had died during admission and were excluded leaving 662 patients (44.1% female) with a median age of 74.8 (interquartile range: 66.0-84.2) years for further analysis. A total of 237 (35,8%; 95% CI 32.1-39.6) patients were readmitted within 90 days, and 54(8.2%) had died after discharge without being readmitted. We found that a history of malignant disease (aSHR 1,61; 1.16-2.23), if previously admitted with sepsis within 1 year before the index admission (aSHR; 1.41; 1.08-1.84), and treatment with diuretics (aSHR 1.51; 1.17-1.94) were independent predictors for readmission. aSHR (1.49, 1.13-1.96) for diuretic treatment was almost unchanged after exclusion of patients with heart failure, while aSHR (1.47, 0.96-2.25) for malignant disease was slightly attenuated after exclusion of patients with metastatic tumors.

conclusionsMore than one third of patients admitted with sepsis, and discharged alive, were readmitted within 90 days. A history of malignant disease, if previously admitted with sepsis, and diuretic treatment were independent predictors for 90-day readmission.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesDiureticsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPatient ReadmissionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSepsisDiureticsEmergency departmentPredictorsReadmissionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID33794801
PMCPMC8017866
OpenAlexW3143614249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.