Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794071›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2021

Anthropocene, the plastic age and future perspectives.

Raffaele Porta

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Bio-Based Materials for Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ten years of FEBS Open Bio.FEBS open bio · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Raffaele PortaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples 'Federico II', Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-0664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of plastic waste is one of the main topics on the international societal and political agenda since ever-increasing growth in the quantity of plastic materials produced has gone beyond the ability to manage them effectively at their end-of-life. Mostly pushed by social campaigns, an ever-increasing number of initiatives have been taken by different institutions to reduce the huge amount of plastic waste: first of all, specific legal regulations have been introduced, both to realize effective systems of plastic collection, reuse and recycling, and to outlaw the use of unnecessary disposable one-use items. However, due to the indisputable advantages derived from the use of such a material, every action of decision makers to limit the production or use of plastics is unavoidably affected by economic evaluations, as well as by the deficiency or drawbacks of alternative materials, rather than by environmental reasons. In the three reviews in this Special 'In the Limelight' section, Oliver Bajt, Paola Fabbri et al. and Frederic Debeaufort - invited speakers at the Special Session on Science & Society, entitled 'Plastics: revolution, pollution and substitution', of the 45th FEBS Congress to be held in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 3-8 July 2021 - describe in detail the consequences of plastic pollution (Bajt, 2021, FEBS Open Bio 11, 954-966), the complex transition to bioplastics (Degli Esposti et al., 2021, FEBS Open Bio 11, 967-983) and the possibility to obtain these innovative biodegradable materials from food and marine waste (Debeaufort 2021, FEBS Open Bio 11, 984-998), respectively. This introductory commentary highlights that, in the frame of the bioeconomy paradigm, not only multidisciplinary but also inter- and transdisciplinary research with integrated and multifaceted approaches are needed to produce novel eco-friendly materials with features similar to those of traditional plastics, as well as with acceptable economic and environmental impact.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEnvironmental PollutionPlasticsWaste ManagementWaste ProductsPlasticsWaste Productsanthropocenebioplasticscircular bioeconomyplastic pollutionrenewable feedstock

Identifiers

PMID33794071
PMCPMC8016130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.