Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33794053›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2022

Assortative mating can help adaptation of flowering time to a changing climate: Insights from a polygenic model.

Claire Godineau, Ophélie Ronce, Céline Devaux

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Claire GodineauInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-4208
Ophélie RonceInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Céline DevauxInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-04-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-13-ADAP-0006Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-IDEX-0006CNRSMontpellier University of ExcellencePeter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several empirical studies report fast evolutionary changes in flowering time in response to contemporary climate change. Flowering time is a polygenic trait under assortative mating, since flowering time of mates must overlap. Here, we test whether assortative mating, compared with random mating, can help better track a changing climate. For each mating pattern, our individual-based model simulates a population evolving in a climate characterized by stabilizing selection around an optimal flowering time, which can change directionally and/or fluctuate. We also derive new analytical predictions from a quantitative genetics model for the expected genetic variance at equilibrium, and its components, the lag of the population to the optimum and the population mean fitness. We compare these predictions between assortative and random mating, and to our simulation results. Assortative mating, compared with random mating, has antagonistic effects on genetic variance: it generates positive associations among similar allelic effects, which inflates the genetic variance, but it decreases genetic polymorphism, which depresses the genetic variance. In a stationary environment with substantial stabilizing selection, assortative mating affects little the genetic variance compared with random mating. In a changing climate, assortative mating however increases genetic variance compared to random mating, which diminishes the lag of the population to the optimum, and in most scenarios translates into a fitness advantage relative to random mating. The magnitude of this fitness advantage depends on the extent to which genetic variance limits adaptation, being larger for faster environmental changes and weaker stabilizing selection.

Indexed as

Multifactorial InheritanceReproductionBiological EvolutionClimate ChangeComputer Simulationfitnessgenetic variancelagnonrandom matingphenologyquantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID33794053
PMCPMC9292552
OpenAlexW3141331266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.