Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33793935›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2021

Reproductive phasiRNA loci and DICER-LIKE5, but not microRNA loci, diversified in monocotyledonous plants.

Parth Patel, Sandra M Mathioni, Reza Hammond, Alex E Harkess, Atul Kakrana, Siwaret Arikit, Ayush Dusia, Blake C Meyers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Parth PatelCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Sandra M MathioniDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, MO 63132, USA.
Reza HammondCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Alex E HarkessDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, MO 63132, USA.
Atul KakranaCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Siwaret ArikitDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Ayush DusiaDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Blake C MeyersCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Biotechnology Institute · USDonald Danforth Plant Science Center · USKasetsart University · THUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In monocots other than maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa), the repertoire and diversity of microRNAs (miRNAs) and the populations of phased, secondary, small interfering RNAs (phasiRNAs) are poorly characterized. To remedy this, we sequenced small RNAs (sRNA) from vegetative and dissected inflorescence tissue in 28 phylogenetically diverse monocots and from several early-diverging angiosperm lineages, as well as publicly available data from 10 additional monocot species. We annotated miRNAs, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and phasiRNAs across the monocot phylogeny, identifying miRNAs apparently lost or gained in the grasses relative to other monocot families, as well as a number of transfer RNA fragments misannotated as miRNAs. Using our miRNA database cleaned of these misannotations, we identified conservation at the 8th, 9th, 19th, and 3'-end positions that we hypothesize are signatures of selection for processing, targeting, or Argonaute sorting. We show that 21-nucleotide (nt) reproductive phasiRNAs are far more numerous in grass genomes than other monocots. Based on sequenced monocot genomes and transcriptomes, DICER-LIKE5, important to 24-nt phasiRNA biogenesis, likely originated via gene duplication before the diversification of the grasses. This curated database of phylogenetically diverse monocot miRNAs, siRNAs, and phasiRNAs represents a large collection of data that should facilitate continued exploration of sRNA diversification in flowering plants.

Indexed as

RNA, PlantGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationGenotypeInflorescenceMagnoliopsidaMicroRNAsReproductionSequence Analysis, RNAMicroRNAsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID33793935
PMCPMC8133688
OpenAlexW3126487120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.