Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33793643›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Comparative assessment of immune evasion mechanisms in human whole-blood infection assays by a systems biology approach.

Teresa Lehnert, Maria T E Prauße, Kerstin Hünniger, Jan-Philipp Praetorius, Oliver Kurzai, Marc Thilo Figge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning-based characterization of neutrophil activation phenotypes inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Automated characterisation of neutrophil activation phenotypes inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa LehnertApplied Systems Biology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.
Maria T E PraußeApplied Systems Biology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.
Kerstin HünnigerFungal Septomics, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.
Jan-Philipp PraetoriusApplied Systems Biology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.
Oliver KurzaiCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Marc Thilo FiggeApplied Systems Biology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4044-9166
Jena University Hospital · DELeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer simulations of mathematical models open up the possibility of assessing hypotheses generated by experiments on pathogen immune evasion in human whole-blood infection assays. We apply an interdisciplinary systems biology approach in which virtual infection models implemented for the dissection of specific immune mechanisms are combined with experimental studies to validate or falsify the respective hypotheses. Focusing on the assessment of mechanisms that enable pathogens to evade the immune response in the early time course of a whole-blood infection, the least-square error (LSE) as a measure for the quantitative agreement between the theoretical and experimental kinetics is combined with the Akaike information criterion (AIC) as a measure for the model quality depending on its complexity. In particular, we compare mathematical models with three different types of pathogen immune evasion as well as all their combinations: (i) spontaneous immune evasion, (ii) evasion mediated by immune cells, and (iii) pre-existence of an immune-evasive pathogen subpopulation. For example, by testing theoretical predictions in subsequent imaging experiments, we demonstrate that the simple hypothesis of having a subpopulation of pre-existing immune-evasive pathogens can be ruled out. Furthermore, in this study we extend our previous whole-blood infection assays for the two fungal pathogens Candida albicans and C. glabrata by the bacterial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus and calibrated the model predictions to the time-resolved experimental data for each pathogen. Our quantitative assessment generally reveals that models with a lower number of parameters are not only scored with better AIC values, but also exhibit lower values for the LSE. Furthermore, we describe in detail model-specific and pathogen-specific patterns in the kinetics of cell populations that may be measured in future experiments to distinguish and pinpoint the underlying immune mechanisms.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidiasisHumansImmune EvasionStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID33793643
PMCPMC8016326
OpenAlexW3147887527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.