Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33793561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Emergence of co-expression in gene regulatory networks.

Wencheng Yin, Luis Mendoza, Jimena Monzon-Sandoval, Araxi O Urrutia, Humberto Gutierrez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Canonical Pathways Rewiring in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Homophily within and across groups.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular models of bidirectional promoter regulation.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex Differences in Cochlear Transcriptomes in Horseshoe Bats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wencheng YinCentre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Luis MendozaInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3321-3083
Jimena Monzon-SandovalUK Dementia Research Institute at Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Araxi O UrrutiaInstituto de Ecología, UNAM, Ciudad de México, México.
Humberto GutierrezInstituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-8636
Instituto de Ecología · MXNational Institute of Genomic Medicine · MXUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomes are known to organize themselves into gene co-expression clusters or modules where groups of genes display distinct patterns of coordinated or synchronous expression across independent biological samples. The functional significance of these co-expression clusters is suggested by the fact that highly coexpressed groups of genes tend to be enriched in genes involved in common functions and biological processes. While gene co-expression is widely assumed to reflect close regulatory proximity, the validity of this assumption remains unclear. Here we use a simple synthetic gene regulatory network (GRN) model and contrast the resulting co-expression structure produced by these networks with their known regulatory architecture and with the co-expression structure measured in available human expression data. Using randomization tests, we found that the levels of co-expression observed in simulated expression data were, just as with empirical data, significantly higher than expected by chance. When examining the source of correlated expression, we found that individual regulators, both in simulated and experimental data, fail, on average, to display correlated expression with their immediate targets. However, highly correlated gene pairs tend to share at least one common regulator, while most gene pairs sharing common regulators do not necessarily display correlated expression. Our results demonstrate that widespread co-expression naturally emerges in regulatory networks, and that it is a reliable and direct indicator of active co-regulation in a given cellular context.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsBrainChildChild, PreschoolComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornTranscription FactorsYoung AdultTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33793561
PMCPMC8016302
OpenAlexW3151254369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.