Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33793415›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2021

Five-year follow-up on a sample of gamblers: predictive factors of relapse.

Marie Grall-Bronnec, Morgane Guillou-Landreat, Julie Caillon, Caroline Dubertret, Lucia Romo, Irène Codina, Isabelle Chereau-Boudet, Christophe Lancon, Marc Auriacombe, JEU-Group and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Features Linked to Treatment Outcomes in Behavioral Addictions and Related Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marie Grall-Bronnec1Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-7243
Morgane Guillou-Landreat3Department of Addictology, CHU Brest, Brest, France.
Julie Caillon1Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Caroline Dubertret5Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, INSERM UMR1266, Université de Paris, Team 1, Paris, France.
Lucia Romo7Department of Psychology, Université Paris Nanterre, EA 4430 CLIPSYD, Nanterre, France.
Irène Codina9Marmottan Medical Center, GPS Perray-Vaucluse, Paris, France.
Isabelle Chereau-Boudet10Psychiatry Department, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christophe Lancon11Centre d'études et de recherches sur les services de santé et la qualité de vie, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
Marc Auriacombe12University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
JEU-Group
Jean-Benoit Hardouin2Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, Inserm U1246, Nantes, France.
Gaëlle Challet-Bouju1Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Université de Tours · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFew studies have been conducted on the long-term evolution of gambling disorder (GD). The aim of this study was to identify factors that could predict GD relapse.

methodsData were part of a dataset from a large 5-year cohort of gamblers who were assessed at inclusion and each year thereafter. Participants were recruited from an outpatient addiction treatment center, from various gambling places and through the press. For this specific study, inclusion criteria included (i) transitioning from GD to recovery at a follow-up time and (ii) undergoing at least one follow-up visit afterwards. Participants were evaluated using a structured clinical interview and self-report questionnaires assessing sociodemographic, gambling and clinical characteristics. "Relapse" was defined as the presence of GD (according to the DSM-5) at the N+1th visit following the absence of GD at the Nth visit. A Markov model-based approach was employed to examine predictive factors associated with relapse at a subsequent follow-up visit.

resultsThe sample consisted of 87 participants, aged 47.6 years (sd = 12.6), who were predominantly male (65%). Among the participants, 49 remained in recovery, whereas 38 relapsed. Participants who reported not having experienced at least one month of abstinence and those with a low level of self-directedness at the previous follow-up visit were more likely to relapse.

conclusionsOur findings suggest the existence of factors that are predictive of relapse in individuals with GD who had previously achieved recovery. These results can inspire the development of measures to promote long-term recovery.

Indexed as

AdultBehavior, AddictiveFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGamblingHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsGambling disorderMarkovpredictive modelrecoveryrelapseself-directedness

Identifiers

PMID33793415
PMCPMC8969856
OpenAlexW3152225617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.