ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2021
Spatial Bet Hedging in Sand Fly Oviposition: Factors Affecting Skip Oviposition in
Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrasting Oviposition Preference Despite Limited Chemosensory Receptor Gene Differentiation in Two Cryptic Anopheles Species.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Geometric-Mean Fitness Does Not Correspond to Long-Term Survival Probability.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Skip oviposition is considered as an example of spatial bet hedging and involves a tradeoff between the benefit of reducing the risk of complete reproductive failure due to stochastic loss of a breeding site and the energetic and mortality costs associated with dispersal across several oviposition sites. Skip oviposition has been studied extensively for container-breeding mosquitoes but has never been studied with sand flies. By conducting a series of bioassays using solitary gravid females exposed to varying numbers of oviposition sites and to oviposition sites of variable quality at small (oviposition jar) and medium (free-flight cage) scales, we showed that sand flies exhibited skip oviposit at both scales. Specifically, with low-quality oviposition sites, females spread their eggs across several oviposition sites with total egg clutch size remaining constant and number of eggs per oviposition site decreasing with increasing number of oviposition sites. With variable quality sites, sand flies biased their oviposition to sites containing increasing levels of organic matter (OM), but also laid eggs in poor-quality sites; a behavior consistent with spatial bet hedging. We also demonstrated that the presence of OM stimulated larger egg clutch size and increased percent skip oviposition. Skip oviposition was less frequent at the free flight cage scale. But, at this scale, females were shown to be stimulated to lay more eggs when in the presence of other females than when alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.