ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2021
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biofilm- and Spore-Disruptive Star-Shaped Poly(l-lysine)/Hyaluronic Acid Microgels for Targeted Oral Therapy ofBiomacromolecules · 2026Article
- Article
- Next-Generation Microencapsulation Technologies for Probiotic Protection and Precision Delivery.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Shaping the Future of Functional Foods: Using 3D Printing for the Encapsulation and Development of New Probiotic Foods.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Biomaterials and Encapsulation Techniques for Probiotics: Current Status and Future Prospects in Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Calcium Tungstate Microgel Enhances the Delivery and Colonization of Probiotics during Colitis via Intestinal Ecological Niche Occupancy.ACS central science · 2023Article
- Cytoprotection of ProbioticPolymers · 2023Article
- Activation of a passive, mesoporous silica nanoparticle layer through attachment of bacterially-derived carbon-quantum-dots for protection and functional enhancement of probiotics.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Advances in the Application of Nanomaterials as Treatments for Bacterial Infectious Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy on Microbial Cell Surfaces: A Forgotten Method for the Characterization of Microorganisms Encapsulated With Surface-Engineered Shells.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria can enhance their functionality when used in combination with antibiotics for treating intestinal tract infections. The interaction strength of encapsulating shells, however, varies among the encapsulation methods and impacts encapsulation. Here, we compared the protection offered by encapsulating shells with different interaction strengths toward probiotic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.